Example |
Result |
cats filetype:pdf |
PDFs about cats. Supported file types include: pdf, doc(x), xls(x), ppt(x) |
dogs site:catster.com |
Pages about dogs from catster.com |
cats -site:catster.com |
Pages about cats excluding catster.com |
intitle:dogs |
Page title includes the word dogs |
inurl:cats |
Page URL includes the word cats |
Adapted from Matt Montgomery at CSM
Open web sources can be searched, typically using search engines such as Google, and are available on the internet without requiring authentication (such as user name & password, or a payment being made).
Because anyone can publish anything online, taking extra time to evaluate these resources is very important during your research process. Use your critical skills and tools like the CRAAP test to ensure that the sources you are incorporating are reliable, current, relevant, and trustworthy.
Experts often consider it the best search engine, but be cautious of its blind spots and missing content due to results that favor advertisers and the exclusion of older websites for efficiency. While not using Google might cause you to miss some information, relying solely on Google means you’ll miss even more.
Microsoft's search engine and best runner-up to Google, Bing offers different search functionality and its own special sauce for relevance ranking results. Additionally, now it offers Copilot, a conversational AI search companion.
DuckDuckGo has emerged as one of the best metasearch engines. It focuses mainly on user privacy concerns and removing filter bubbles.
Wikipedia and Academia - This is what Wikipedia says about its use in academic research
Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to distinguished professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea. However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may be considered unacceptable because Wikipedia is not a reliable source.
Many colleges and universities, as well as public and private secondary schools, have policies that prohibit students from using Wikipedia as their source for doing research papers, essays, or equivalent assignments. This is because Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any moment. When an error is recognized it is usually fixed.
Follow two simple rules:
- Do your research properly and wisely. Remember that any encyclopedia is a starting point for research, not an ending point.
Where does the information come from?
ChatGPT was trained on a body of text which allows it to generate text in response to a prompt. Some partial lists of the training dataset exist, and ChatGPT will also provide a partial list when queried. However, the entire body of text that has trained ChatGPT is unknown.
When ChatGPT provides an answer to a question, it will not immediately provide a reference for where the information came from. This is because it is pulling predictive language from a wide variety of places, so the information usually doesn't come from a single source. Because of this, you typically cannot trace the response back to a single parent source or know where the information came from.
Can ChatGPT provide references?
Yes, when prompted, ChatGPT can provide references. However, these references may not be where the information actually came from and - more importantly - may not be for real sources. Despite sounding plausible, ChatGPT can easily hallucinate citations (PDF).
Taken from Amy Scheelke AI, ChatGPT, and the Library from Salt Lake Community College Libraries and licensed licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.